PAO issue: Employees disown letter complaint vs
Acosta 1

Over a hundred public lawyers sign a manifesto disowning the letter against their chief Persida Acosta

Published 9:44 AM, August 16, 2019

Updated 9:45 AM, August 16, 2019

CHIEF PUBLIC ATTORNEY. Over a hundred public attorneys from the PAO Central Office sign a manifesto disowning a letter to the Office of the Ombudsman accusing PAO chief Persida Acosta of corruption. Photo by Angie de Silva/Rappler

CHIEF PUBLIC ATTORNEY. Over a hundred public attorneys from the PAO Central Office sign a manifesto disowning a letter to the Office of the Ombudsman accusing PAO chief Persida Acosta of corruption. Photo by Angie de Silva/Rappler

MANILA, Philippines – Lawyers from the Public Attorney’s Office Central Office released a manifesto on Thursday, August 15, denying that they are part of an unidentified group that sent a letter to the Office of the Ombudsman accusing PAO chief Persida Acosta and another official of corruption.

Over a hundred public attorneys from the Central Office signed the manifesto released to media Thursday, following reports that a group of PAO lawyers submitted a , alleging that Acosta deliberately overstocked on office supplies to “obtain extra funds.”

“The undersigned public attorneys herein categorically deny the alleged subject anonymous manifestation that has become the subject of fake news,” the manifesto said, echoing Acosta’s own statement on the issue.

The lawyers said the Ombudsman manifestation was a mere “demolition job” against PAO.

“Obviously, the manifestation was fabricated by someone else; unscrupulous persons who resort to shady schemes and strategies to advance their personal cause,” they said in their manifesto

The manifestation to the Ombudsman was unsigned but the group behind it claimed to be from PAO. The Office of the Ombudsman’s central records office had marked the manifestation as received.

The manifestation seeks to supplement a formal complaint filed by lawyer Wilfredo Garrido against Acosta and PAO forensics expert Erwin Erfe, for setting up a PAO forensics laboratory even if it was not provided by the law that created PAO. Garrido pointed out that only Congress can create a public office.

Garrido’s complaint, filed in October 2018, is Justice Secretary Menardo Guevarra had said that the Department of Justice, which oversees PAO, would not conduct a separate probe on the allegation and would will leave it to the Ombudsman to resolve.

Garrido and the manifestation both seek the preventive suspension of Acosta and Erfe. – Rappler.com

Take discussions to the next level with Rappler PLUS — your platform for deeper insights, closer collaboration, and meaningful action.

Sign up today and access exclusive content, events, and workshops curated especially for those who crave clarity and collaboration in an intelligent, action-oriented community.

You can also support Rappler without a PLUS membership. Help us stay free and independent by making a donation: . Every contribution counts.